Biden Garbage Transcript Cover-up: White House Allegedly Alters President’s Comments on Trump Supporters

Source: YouTube

The recent Biden garbage transcript incident has reignited debates over White House transparency and the careful management of presidential communications. Allegedly, the White House altered the transcript of President Joe Biden’s remarks, where he appeared to disparage Trump supporters as “garbage.” According to sources, this transcript change has prompted concerns from within the White House stenography team and triggered strong reactions from the public and political figures alike.

Origins of the Biden Garbage Transcript Controversy

The controversy began during a virtual call President Biden held with Voto Latino, a Latino advocacy group, where he criticized a comedian who, at a Trump rally, referred to Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage.” Biden reportedly responded to the comedian’s remarks by saying, “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters.” This line quickly drew attention, interpreted by many as an attack on Trump’s base.

According to reports by the Associated Press and Fox News, the White House press office edited Biden’s words in the official transcript, adding an apostrophe to the word “supporters” to imply Biden was targeting the comedian’s rhetoric rather than Trump supporters as a whole. The resulting transcript now read, “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporter’s,” a subtle but significant change that attempted to downplay Biden’s language.

Stenographers Raise Concerns Over Transcript Integrity

The Biden garbage transcript controversy intensified when stenographers flagged this edit as a violation of protocol. Emails viewed by Fox News reveal that a supervisor in the stenography office raised concerns about what they considered a “breach of protocol and spoliation of transcript integrity.” The White House stenography office, which is responsible for documenting presidential speeches, maintains that edits of this nature should not be made without their approval or input.

Amy Sands, Director of White House Stenography, reportedly reprimanded the press office, reminding them that rush drafts sent for assistance should not be publicly released until a thorough review is conducted. Sands emphasized that such changes might create confusion among the media, public, and government records, as the altered transcript shared by the White House press office diverged from the initial transcript sent to the National Archives.

The White House Responds and Public Reactions

White House spokesperson Andrew Bates responded to the controversy, stating that Biden’s tweet, posted later that evening, clarified his intent. In the tweet, Biden mentioned that he was addressing the hateful rhetoric, calling it “garbage,” but insisted that he was targeting the specific language used by Trump’s supporter rather than Trump’s base as a whole. “The comments at that rally don’t reflect who we are as a nation,” Biden wrote.

However, Republican lawmakers and Trump himself seized on Biden’s comment, drawing comparisons to Hillary Clinton’s “deplorables” comment in 2016. Trump reacted to the remark during a rally in Pennsylvania, quipping, “But he doesn’t know—you have to please forgive him. Please forgive him. For he not knoweth what he said.” Trump even used the controversy to his advantage, posing in a garbage truck in Wisconsin to mock Biden’s statement further.

Vice President Kamala Harris, facing pressure to clarify her stance, distanced herself from Biden’s “garbage” comment. When speaking to reporters, Harris stated, “I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for,” stressing her commitment to representing all Americans.

The Broader Implications of the Biden Garbage Transcript

The Biden garbage transcript episode has sparked widespread reactions on social media and news outlets, igniting debates on transparency in White House communications. The White House stenography office’s objections reveal the tension between preserving accurate records and managing public relations, especially in politically charged statements. House Republicans have since voiced concerns that altering the transcript might violate the Presidential Records Act, with Representative Elise Stefanik and Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer urging the White House to preserve all documents related to Biden’s statement.

Transparency advocates argue that altering transcripts could damage the public’s trust, as even subtle changes might be seen as attempts to manipulate the President’s words to avoid backlash. Critics suggest that such edits risk deepening partisan divides and fueling conspiracy theories. Meanwhile, many see the Biden garbage transcript incident as a lesson for the White House to handle the nuances of presidential speech with increased caution.

What do you think of the Biden garbage transcript? Did he actually call Trump supporters garbage? Tell us what you think!