QUICK SUMMARY: Dr. Anthony Fauci invoked his right to remain silent 111 times during a Senate hearing Wednesday, refusing every question about COVID-19’s origins. Sen. Rand Paul scheduled a contempt of Congress vote against Fauci’s Fifth amendment plea for next week. If it passes, the case goes to the Justice Department, though a past contempt referral against a federal official never led to charges.
Dr. Anthony Fauci sat before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday and invoked his Fifth Amendment rights 111 times in a row. The former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) gave the same 24-word answer to every question for over two hours: “Under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from answering your questions.” That single sentence was the only thing he said.
The hearing came three days after Sen. Rand Paul released more than 1,000 pages of Fauci’s personal pandemic-era diaries, or 1,114 pages by Paul’s own committee count, which the Senator says prove a gap between what Fauci wrote in private and what he told the country. Fauci opened by accusing Paul of an “unhinged obsession” with prosecuting him, then invoked his Fifth Amendment rights on every question that followed, including ones about the color of his tie.
Not everyone in the room agreed on how far to push it. Sen. Ron Johnson told Fauci he wasn’t surprised: “I think it would be almost impossible for you to answer the questions truthfully without really demonstrating what you did.” Sen. Richard Blumenthal called the hearing part of “a continuing vendetta against a single individual.”
Fauci’s Fifth Amendment Rights Collide With His Pardon
Fauci’s plea rests on one legal question: can a man who already received a full pardon still claim the Fifth Amendment protects him?
President Joe Biden gave Fauci a preemptive pardon in the final hours of his term, covering any conduct tied to his COVID-19 work. Paul argues that the pardon removes the “reasonable fear of prosecution” the Fifth Amendment exists to protect, since Fauci can’t be charged for anything the pardon already covers. The former White House physician’s side argues the pardon doesn’t protect him from a new charge like perjury, based on what he says today.
Comer Says the Pardon Itself Is on Shaky Ground
House Oversight Chairman James Comer added a second front. He says Biden’s pardon, issued by autopen rather than by hand, sits on “legally questionable” ground to begin with. “Biden’s pardon doesn’t cover Dr. Fauci’s testimony this week, and if he continues to lie, he must be held accountable,” Comer told Fox News Digital. Legal analysts note Fauci still carries some legal exposure depending on how a court eventually reads the autopen question, though that argument hasn’t been tested yet.
The Contempt Vote on Fauci’s Fifth Amendment Pleas Only Does So Much
Paul told reporters the committee will hold next week’s committee vote on whether to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress. If it passes, the matter goes to the Justice Department, which decides whether to bring charges. A criminal contempt of Congress conviction can carry up to a year in prison and a $100,000 fine. That’s separate from DOJ’s other fights already underway this year.
Here’s what that vote actually adds up to, and where the numbers stop:
- 111 times Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment
- 1,114 pages in the diary release that triggered the hearing
- 24 words in Fauci’s only substantive answer, repeated every time
- $100,000 and one year, the maximum fine and sentence for criminal contempt of Congress
- 0 times the Justice Department has prosecuted the last comparable case
The Lois Lerner Case Shows a Vote Isn’t a Guarantee
That last number matters most. In 2014, the House voted to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt after she pleaded the Fifth during an investigation into the agency’s targeting of conservative groups. The vote passed. The Justice Department never charged her. It’s the same pattern BNA has tracked before, where accountability mechanisms fizzle once the cameras move on.
A contempt vote is a referral, not a verdict. Paul can schedule the vote to punish Fauci’s Fifth Amendment pleas. He can’t force the Justice Department to act on it, and history says that’s exactly where these things tend to stall. The Kentucky Senator has been building this case for years. His book, Deception: The Great Covid Cover-Up, lays out the paper trail he says led to Wednesday’s hearing, from the funding decisions to what he calls years of contradictory testimony.
BreakingNewsAlerts.com participates in the Amazon Associates program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this article, at no extra cost to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was Dr. Fauci charged with contempt of Congress?
No, not yet. However, the Senate Homeland Security Committee scheduled a vote for next week.
Can Fauci’s Fifth Amendment pleadings lead him to jail?
Not for the plea itself. If the contempt vote passes and the Justice Department decides to prosecute, a conviction could carry up to a year in prison and a $100,000 fine.
Does Fauci’s pardon protect him from all of this?
Republicans are split on two separate arguments. Paul says the pardon means Fauci had no valid reason to plead the Fifth. Comer says the pardon itself may not be legally valid. Neither claim has been tested in court.
What happened the last time Congress held a federal official in contempt like this?
The House held former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt in 2014. The Justice Department never charged her.
Reader Poll
Loading ...
