Connect with us

Breaking News

Merrick Garland Fires Back at DOJ and FBI Critics

Published

on

Merrick Garland Fires Back at DOJ and FBI Critics

Source: YouTube

Attorney General Merrick Garland delivered a forceful response to growing accusations from former President Trump, who continues to allege that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been weaponized for political purposes. In a speech delivered to DOJ staff and U.S. attorneys, Garland defended the integrity of the department and rejected claims that it is being used as a political tool. His remarks came in the wake of Trump’s accusations during the recent presidential debate.

Trump’s Allegations in the Debate

During the debate, Trump took direct aim at the DOJ and FBI, accusing both agencies of political bias. He specifically pointed to the various cases brought against him, including the fraud case in New York and the election subversion charges in Georgia. According to Trump, all of these cases were part of a coordinated effort by the Biden administration to undermine him politically.

“They weaponized the Justice Department,” Trump claimed during the debate. “Every one of those cases was involved with the DOJ, from Atlanta and Fani Willis to the attorney general of New York and the DA in New York.” Trump’s accusations didn’t stop there. He also questioned the FBI’s reliability, suggesting that the bureau’s investigations into him had been politically motivated from the start.

This isn’t the first time Trump made such claims against the Justice Department. He has consistently framed the DOJ and FBI as part of a “deep state” conspiracy against him, accusing them of going after him while protecting others, including political opponents.

A Long History with the FBI

Trump’s relationship with the FBI has been fraught with tension, particularly since his 2016 campaign. The bureau’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, known as the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, marked the beginning of Trump’s public mistrust of the FBI. He has since accused the agency of unfairly targeting him, pointing to the raid on his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2022 as an example of overreach.

More recently, Trump has raised concerns about the FBI’s involvement in a reported assassination attempt against him. Although the details of the incident remain vague, Trump’s allegations further complicate his already tense relationship with the bureau. He continues to use these incidents to question the FBI’s credibility and reinforce his claims that the DOJ and FBI have been “weaponized” against him.

Merrick Garland’s Defense of the DOJ

The DOJ chief, however, pushed back hard against these accusations, reaffirming the department’s independence and its role in upholding the rule of law. Speaking to a room filled with DOJ employees, Garland said, “It is dangerous to target and intimidate individual employees of this department simply for doing their jobs. And it is outrageous that you have to face these unfounded attacks.”

The attorney general took a firm stance against the politicization of the DOJ, emphasizing that the department operates under one standard for all, regardless of political affiliation. “There is not one rule for friends and another for foes,” Garland said, making it clear that the department’s work is guided by law, not politics.

DOJ’s 60-Day Election Rule

Garland’s speech also came at a significant moment. The DOJ is now within its 60-day preelection window, a policy designed to avoid influencing elections by refraining from filing cases against political candidates. While Garland did not explicitly mention this rule, his speech was a reminder of the department’s commitment to fairness, especially during such a politically charged time.

Despite the ongoing attacks, Garland made it clear that the DOJ will not be intimidated. “You deserve better,” he told his staff, praising them for their commitment to justice and resilience in the face of political pressure.

As the 2024 election approaches, the DOJ is likely to remain a focal point of political debate. Trump’s ongoing legal battles, combined with his relentless attacks on the justice system, will continue to stir controversy. However, Garland’s speech serves as a reminder that the DOJ’s mission is to uphold the law, no matter the political climate.

Do agree with Merrick Garland’s defense of the Justice Department? Tell us what you think.

Do you believe that the present Justice Department is an impartial, fair, and competent organization?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Continue Reading
4 Comments

4 Comments

  • Ron says:

    Hello, I do not agree with Merrick Garlands defense of the DOJ. This is evident in the handling of issues related to local law enforcement agencies across the United States. Their handling of these issues points to an organization the is struggling to follow a moral code and not just the rule of law. I would love to debate Mr. Garland about the struggles of the DOJ. He will lose!
    Thank you for allowing us to leave a comment.

  • Chris says:

    Russiagate was proof of the bias in the FBI. How many investigations are ongoing the targeting democrats. How many arrests have been made against democrats.

    Y ou can’t tell me Republican are crooked and Democrats are not. We all know bothe sides are crooked but our justice system seems to have a major focus on one side.

  • Bob Rea says:

    If there were just a few instances, we could all have more confidence in the DOJ and the FBI, I fir4mly believe they were given a mission that they could not refuse. My encounters with field agents have always been positive and great people to work with. The instructions must be coming from the highest levels

  • Eric Anthony says:

    Bob Rea: You obviously have some unique contacts in this field and I don’t doubt what you say. As a citizen observer of this degenerating process it appears to be the intentional breaking down of the structure and trust in these agencies. Why, for instance is an 89 yr. old grandmother peacefully protesting at an abortion clinic sent to prison for the rest of her life, but BLM looters and rioters who did actual damage and murder, not prosecuted or convicted? Garland says there is no agenda to go after conservatives, school board parents or pro lifers; but the evidence says otherwise. I am sure those field agents you mention must be equally concerned by what they see from the inside; but are also even more censored and muzzled than the propaganda narratives that go out to the general public. Pray for this nation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2022 Breaking News Alerts. This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.