RFK Jr Turns to Trump to Remove Fluoride in Water Supplies Across America

Source: YouTube

In a recent twist, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., former independent presidential candidate and prominent health advocate, has raised concerns about fluoride in water supplies across America. He claims that fluoride, commonly added to public water systems to reduce dental decay, is an “industrial waste” linked to various health issues like arthritis, thyroid disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Kennedy took to social media to state that, if Trump wins the upcoming election, his administration would move to remove fluoride from U.S. water systems.

Kennedy’s stance on fluoride in water has reignited debates around its safety. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Dental Association (ADA) endorse water fluoridation as a safe, effective public health measure, reducing dental decay by 25% among children and adults. However, some studies, such as a 2023 National Toxicology Program review, suggest potential risks at higher exposure levels, linking fluoride to lowered IQ in children, though the levels in U.S. drinking water are generally lower than those found in these studies.

While Kennedy’s assertions have yet to align with mainstream science, his views resonate with some who question government intervention in public health.

Trump’s Tentative Support: Aligning with RFK Jr. on Health Policy

Former President Donald Trump appears receptive to Kennedy’s controversial stance, stating that Kennedy’s proposal to remove fluoride “sounds OK” to him. While Trump admitted he hadn’t discussed the matter in detail with Kennedy, he implied that removing fluoride could be on the table if Kennedy joined his administration in a health advisory role.

Trump’s endorsement of Kennedy’s broader health views has been clear. At recent rallies, Trump has praised Kennedy’s expertise and indicated that he might “go wild on health” in his administration, suggesting that Kennedy’s unorthodox approach could bring substantial change. This alignment between Trump and Kennedy has attracted attention, particularly among voters wary of conventional public health measures.

By signaling support for Kennedy’s anti-fluoride in water position, Trump connects with voters who favor less governmental control over personal health choices. However, public health officials remain concerned about the potential consequences of such a decision, emphasizing that decades of research support fluoride’s role in preventing dental issues, especially in children and communities with limited access to dental care.

Kennedy’s History with Vaccines: A Wider Pattern of Health Skepticism

Kennedy’s stance on fluoride echoes his long-standing criticism of vaccines, a viewpoint that has often put him at odds with mainstream medical authorities. Known for his controversial claims linking vaccines to autism, Kennedy has been a leading figure in anti-vaccine movements. He has repeatedly alleged that vaccines, including childhood vaccinations, cause a host of developmental issues despite numerous studies disproving such links.

Trump has not dismissed Kennedy's anti-vaccine views, even hinting that he might consider adjusting vaccine policies. While Trump has supported vaccine development in the past, including the COVID-19 vaccine, he has also expressed personal doubts, fueling a degree of skepticism among his supporters.

If Kennedy assumes a prominent role in a Trump administration, his influence could signal a significant shift in federal health policy, especially regarding vaccines. The combination of their views on fluoride and vaccines could redefine the U.S. approach to public health, emphasizing personal choice over widespread mandates.

Public Health Implications and the Road Ahead

The public health community is on high alert as the potential alliance between Trump and Kennedy raises questions about the future of policies like water fluoridation and vaccine mandates. Health experts caution that removing fluoride from water supplies could reverse decades of progress in preventing dental issues, particularly in underserved communities.

The debate over fluoride in water —and the possibility of vaccine policy shifts—highlights a growing tension between public health authorities and advocates for individual choice in health interventions. With Election Day around the corner, Trump’s statements on health policy could become a focal point for voters, potentially shaping the direction of U.S. health initiatives in a new administration.

Do you agree that fluoride is an industrial waste that should be removed from US water systems? Tell us what you think!

 Loading ...