Connect with us

Breaking News

World Leaders Disturbed With Trump’s Twitter Ban

Published

on

CNN news with Twitter bans President Trump permanently headlines on smartphone screen-Trump’s Twitter Ban-ss-featured

When President Donald Trump’s Twitter ban became permanent “due to the risk of further incitement of violence,” many world leaders reacted. While many hailed the move to prevent further violence, many also questioned Twitter’s authority to do so. Expectedly, countries hostile to the US welcomed the move. However, many leaders, Trump critics included, condemned the move as politically motivated and a threat to free speech.

RELATED: Trump’s Social Accounts Suspended by Twitter and Facebook

Last January 8, Twitter suspended the United States President Donald Trump’s account. In an official statement, Twitter stated that “After a close review of recent Tweets from the @realDonaldTrump account and the context around them we have permanently suspended the account due to the risk of further incitement of violence.”

The decision to Ban Trump Is “Problematic”

Among the world leaders that reacted to Trump’s Twitter ban is German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Through her spokesperson, she said that lawmakers should set rules governing free speech. Conversely, private technology companies shouldn’t. During a Berlin news conference, chief spokesman Steffen Seibert said that “The chancellor sees the complete closing down of the account of an elected president as problematic.”  

Seibert noted that an individual’s freedom of opinion contains “elementary significance.” He added that a “framework defined by legislators” can intervene in this freedom. It should not come from “a decision by the management of social media platforms. “Seen from this angle, the chancellor considers it problematic that the accounts of the US president have now been permanently blocked.”

France Echoes Germany

France seemed to agree with Merkel on Twitter matter. Junior Minister for European Union Affairs Clement Beaune expressed shock that a private company made such an important decision. Beaune told reporters that citizens should decide on matters like this, and not CEOs. There needs to be public regulation of big online platforms.” 

In addition, Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire noted that instead of “the digital oligarchy,” the state should hold the responsibility for regulations. Le Maire called it “one of the threats” to democracy.  Even prior to Trump’s Twitter ban, Europe is wary of the growing influence of big technology companies. In fact, the European Commission is currently pushing for reforms that give them the authority to break up technology companies and platforms if they do not follow EU rules. 

Other Leaders Chime In

In addition to Merkel and Le Maire, other leaders also gave their two cents’ worth. Eduardo Bolsonaro, son of Brazil’s rightist president Jair Bolsonaro, called it “authoritarian” to ban Trump from Twitter. He added that it cannot be normal for a world to have Maduro on social media while Trump isn’t. As a tribute to Trump, Eduardo announced that he will use Trump’s profile picture for his own account.

trump-bobblehead-1
Raven_Steel_Ad-07

Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny called the ban “an unacceptable act of censorship.” He said “emotions and personal political preferences” served as the basis for the suspension. Trump didn’t get suspended for violating Twitter’s rules, he said.  Referring to his own experiences, Navalny said he received death threats daily for years. Yet, Twitter never acted on them, nor did he ask them to do so. He feared that Trump’s Twitter ban can serve as a precedent to clamp freedom of speech elsewhere. 

In addition, Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador also disagreed with Trump’s Twitter ban. Obrador said that it’s always a “bad sign” if private companies can censor opinions. During a news conference, he said he never liked censoring anyone or taking away rights to post a message on Twitter or Facebook. He said, “I don’t agree with that, I don’t accept that.” In addition, Obrador compared the situation to “a court of censorship like the Inquisition to manage public opinion: this is really serious.”

Joining in on the Debate

Even other local personalities are getting in the Twitter debate. Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, tweeted an observation.  “A lot of people are going to be super unhappy with West Coast high tech as the de facto arbiter of free speech,” he tweeted. Also, Nikki Haley, Trump’s ally and former ambassador to the UN, gave Trump her support. She tweeted: “Silencing people, not to mention the President of the US, is what happens in China, not our country.” She added an “#Unbelievable” hashtag to her tweet.

Watch the Daily Mail news report where a spokesperson for German Chancellor Angela Merkel talks about Trump’s Twitter ban:

Who should decide on matters pertaining to freedom of speech on social media?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Do you agree with the decision to enforce President Trump’s Twitter ban? In addition, should this power of selective censorship belong to social media companies? Let us know what you think about Twitter’s power to ban people. Share your thoughts and opinions in the comments section below.

Continue Reading
3 Comments

3 Comments

  • Sheila Harris says:

    Everyone needs to close their accounts and hit them where it hurts! Their stock has already dropped big time! I love it! #Trump2020

  • Rebecca Henderson says:

    This is to try and lower his confidence, but he is not moved by this. He will just fight harder. We should close out our Twitter, google, YouTube, and others because we must fight back against this unjust tyranny. I have already closed my prime/amazon, google and YouTube accounts. I don’t have any other than Parlor. Well did.

    Just thinking; what we’re these big Tech guys offered to act against our constitution and the laws we have in this country?

  • Doyle Wagener says:

    Free speech is is not a privilege it is a right. These high tech companies have gone to far. They have no problem calling outrageous burnings of properties and looting as just (what did they call it)
    Peaceful protests. I think taking them off our way of transferring info would stop them. They are collecting more info on us daily. We should be careful or we will be next.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2020 Breaking News Alerts. This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.

[email]
[email]