South Korea Declares, Then Ends the Shortest Martial Law in History

Source: YouTube

In an unprecedented turn of events, South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law late Tuesday night, only to rescind it five hours later amid intense political and public backlash. This brief period of military rule has now earned the distinction of being the shortest martial law declaration in modern history.

Yoon justified the move as a response to what he called “anti-state forces” undermining the government and threatening South Korea’s democracy. The declaration granted sweeping powers to the military, banning protests, political activities, and media freedoms. Citizens could also be detained without warrants. However, the swift public and political opposition forced Yoon to reverse course almost as quickly as the decree was announced.

A Sudden Move Sparks Outrage

The martial law declaration immediately evoked memories of South Korea’s authoritarian past, particularly the military dictatorship of the 1980s. Thousands of protesters gathered outside the National Assembly within hours, chanting, “No martial law!” Opposition leaders from the Democratic Party called the move illegal and unconstitutional, with some urging citizens to resist.

In a rare show of unity, even members of Yoon’s conservative People Power Party criticized the decision. Party leader Han Dong-hoon labeled the declaration “the wrong move,” while opposition leader Lee Jae-myung described it as a betrayal of democracy. The National Assembly acted decisively, passing a resolution demanding the immediate lifting of martial law. This rapid response from lawmakers underscored South Korea’s robust democratic institutions and their ability to check executive overreach.

The Shortest Martial Law in Context

Martial law, historically imposed during times of war or severe unrest, has often lasted weeks or months. For example, in the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos’ martial law endured nearly a decade, from 1972 to 1981. In contrast, President Yoon’s martial law, lasting just five hours, stands out as a testament to the strength of South Korea’s democracy and the swift mobilization of its citizens and institutions against authoritarian measures.

Yoon’s declaration also highlighted the fragility of his presidency. With approval ratings hovering around 17% and a parliament dominated by opposition lawmakers, his administration has faced significant challenges. The martial law announcement appeared to be a desperate attempt to regain control amid mounting political scandals and legislative roadblocks.

What Prompted the Drastic Move to Declare Martial Law?

Yoon cited “anti-state forces” as the primary reason for declaring martial law, accusing opposition lawmakers of paralyzing government functions. The declaration followed a series of setbacks, including opposition efforts to cut the government’s budget and impeach top officials. Yoon’s critics, however, argued that the move was a ploy to distract from his administration’s corruption scandals, including allegations against the First Lady.

The president’s actions have drawn comparisons to South Korea’s authoritarian past, particularly the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, when martial law was used to suppress pro-democracy protests. While Yoon’s declaration lacked the violence of that era, the parallels were enough to provoke widespread outrage.

What’s Next for South Korea?

The rapid lifting of martial law has done little to quell calls for Yoon’s impeachment. The opposition-controlled National Assembly is now debating whether to remove him from office, a process that requires a two-thirds majority vote. If successful, the Constitutional Court will determine his fate, potentially making Yoon the third South Korean president to face impeachment in the democratic era.

Yoon’s brief experiment with martial law has left lasting implications. It has highlighted deep divisions within South Korea’s political system while demonstrating the resilience of its democratic institutions. The incident may tarnish South Korea’s reputation as a stable democracy, but it also serves as a reminder of the country’s progress since its authoritarian past.

Was South Korea’s five-hour martial law declaration justified, or was it a political misstep? Tell us what you think!

 Loading ...